Written by: Chris__Fleming - February 19, 2013

Manchester United’s defensive troubles | What is the solution? | Stats Analysis


Manchester United remain at the summit of the Premier League, scoring goals at will and playing with an attacking verve that has seen Sir Alex Ferguson label the team better than the treble-winning side of ‘99.

However, this season United have too often suffered defensive lapses, seeing the team concede 31 goals in 26 games.

This begs the questions, who is Manchester United’s best centre-back and what is United’s best defensive partnership? To answer that it is necessary to compare stats between each centre-back and, for context, to compare their stats to other centre-backs in the league.

Defensive statistics for Rio Ferdinand 2012/13 

RFD 261x300 Manchester Uniteds defensive troubles | What is the solution? | Stats Analysis

Rio Ferdinand has been integral to United sides over the years and has arguably been the fulcrum again this season. Ferdinand’s tackle success rate of 78% is somewhat average though, especially when compared to other Premier League centre-backs including Vincent Kompany (88%), Thomas Vermaelen (86%) and Gary Cahill (83%).

It is perhaps Ferdinand’s number of errors that has been the greatest cause for concern. He has already made 2 in 2012/13 and he made 3 in total during 2011/12, which is a stark contrast to his error free season in 2010/11.

Defensive statistics for Nemanja Vidic for 2012/13

NVD 262x300 Manchester Uniteds defensive troubles | What is the solution? | Stats Analysis

It is important to stress that Nemanja Vidic has started only 10 games this season, making 1 appearance from the substitutes bench. So not only will his statistics be based on less data, but he has yet to gather any momentum this season which will of course have a knock-on effect on his performances.

Nevertheless, it is clear that Vidic has endured a somewhat tough season, with only a 71% tackle success rate. What is important though is his aerial prowess, where his success rate of 71% outdoes Ferdinand’s 58%.

This is why Vidic remains invaluable to United, because his presence and authority in the air is what sets him apart from any other United defender.

Indeed, Vidic (71%) has a better aerial success rate when compared to Kompany (58%) and Vermaelen (59%), yet it is less impressive than Cahill (74%).

Defensive statistics for Jonny Evans 2012/13

JED 261x300 Manchester Uniteds defensive troubles | What is the solution? | Stats Analysis

 Jonny Evans, meanwhile, has been praised for assuming responsibility in the absence of either Ferdinand or Vidic and has put in some commanding performances for United. This suggests that the Northern Ireland international is finally repaying Ferguson’s faith where once he was heavily criticised by fans and pundits alike.

What is interesting is that Evans’ defensive stats are still inferior to those of Ferdinand and Vidic. Evans has a tackle success rate of 72% and an aerial success win rate of 57%.

From a purely objective standpoint, given Vidic’s aerial ability and Ferdinand’s superior tackling ability, it is difficult to make a case for Evans starting if all three are fit and available for United.

However, Evans has weighed in with his fair share of goals (3) and has the most clean sheets to his name with 5, compared to Ferdinand’s 3 and Vidic’s 2. This twinned with the fact that Ferdinand and Vidic are ageing and finding it tougher to play twice weekly means that the three are likely to be used in rotation, as Ferguson alluded to recently.

Recent Examples

Manchester United have kept two clean sheets in their last two games, so it is pertinent to use these two games to illustrate the case in point.

In the 2-0 victory over Everton, Vidic and Evans combined to shut out an Everton side which has scored 40 goals in 26 games this season.

Before that in the 1-0 victory away at Fulham, Ferdinand and Evans were the pairing that kept a clean sheet.

So it is clear then that regardless of the combination, each defender is vital.

This was perfectly demonstrated in the 2-1 home victory over Southampton, where Vidic was partnered with Chris Smalling who was substituted for Ferdinand after struggling for an hour. Vidic was imperious, winning 80% of his aerial duels which is significant given Rickie Lambert’s aerial threat.

Concluding Thoughts

Ferdinand and Vidic have typically been shoe-ins to start together for Manchester United and many fans would still consider them United’s two best defenders.

They are however getting older and becoming more susceptible to injuries.  Along with this, for want of a better word, decline, Jonny Evans has matured into a fine defender who is rightly deserving of his plaudits.

As Ferguson has already hinted, Ferdinand and Vidic are not likely to start every game together. Whilst the stats show that each player has his own respective strengths and weaknesses, perhaps a three-way rotation system is ideal.

It suits Manchester United. For instance, Vidic played in the home victory over Everton but then sat out the Champions League away leg at Real Madrid and yet this was purposeful. It was a decision taken because Jonny Evans is more than capable and simultaneously allowed Vidic to rest and recover.

In essence, because of the sheer number of games that Manchester United play over the course of a season, a rotation system is the solution to the troubles that Ferdinand and Vidic are likely to face in the latter stages of their careers.

The comfort for United fans is that Evans is ready-made for such a role and has shown himself to be worthy of a starting place.

This, along with the potential to play Chris Smalling, Phil Jones and even Michael Carrick at centre-back means that whilst United may have struggled in defence this season, they have more than enough quality to stick with that they have instead of delving into the transfer market.

Taken part in our poll above? The race for the Premier League Top Scorer is on! Can van Persie stay at the top? You decide (stats are below)!

Suarez van Persie Manchester Uniteds defensive troubles | What is the solution? | Stats Analysis

All of the stats from this article have been taken from the Opta Stats Centre at EPLIndex.comSubscribe Now (Includes author privileges!) Check out our new Top Stats feature on the Stats Centre which allows you to compare all players in the league & read about new additions to the stats centre.





Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel via Twitter.
What do you think about this post?
  • Excellent
  • Informative
  • Awesome
  • Good Read
  • ok


About the Author

Chris__Fleming
Chris__Fleming
3rd Year Sports Student at University of Southampton. Sport fanatic. @Chris__Fleming Researcher for Infostrada Sports and reporter for the IPC at the 2012 Paralympic Games.




 
 

 
Error Prone Teams Premier League 2012-13

Info-Graphic | Most Error Prone Teams in the Premier League 2012-13

There are some surprises in the info-graphic below. You’d expect the relegation threatened teams to be the most error prone in the Premier League and whilst this is true in the case of Newcastle United (just about stayed ...
by Statto
0

 
 
Spurs AVB

Have Tottenham Improved Under AVB? Opta Stats Analysis

Andre Villas-Boas has impressed this season, his debut as Tottenham manager, finishing on a record 72 points and taking Spurs to a Europa League quarter final. Spurs just missed out on Champions League qualification, finishing ...
by James Amey
2

 
 
Best Right Back

Who is the best Premier League right-back? | Stats Comparison

When you’re sitting in the pub with your mates, picking your favourites of the Premier League, the one position that has to be the hardest to choose a winner for is the right-back. It is not in any way as easy as left-bac...
by Brock
3

 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


+ five = 6

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>