Written by: CharlieTHFC_ - August 20, 2012

Scott Parker or Sandro? A statistical comparison


Not since Harry Redknapp signed Wilson Palacios in January of 2009 have Spurs had a tough tackling midfielder to compliment the creativity and flair in their midfield ranks. That was the case until Redknapp persuaded Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy to part with £5 million for West Ham United and England’s Scott Parker.30596245891 300x212 Scott Parker or Sandro? A statistical comparison

Parker’s arrival late in the summer transfer window of 2011 coincided with a turnaround in Tottenham’s fortune following an embarrassing opening pair of defeats at the hands of the two Manchester clubs. His simple passing game combined with his ability to make interceptions at vital times, his persistence in winning the ball back and his overall leadership saw him earn plaudits from even the most pessimistic of Spurs supporters. His arrival at White Hart Lane wasn’t approved by all the Tottenham faithful, but his robust style and winning attitude won over doubters almost as quickly as Parker himself could close down his next opponent.

While Parker battled his way into the hearts of many a Spurs fan, another midfielder with a similar style was struggling with injury. When he returned to fitness, he found playing time hard to come by, such was the form being shown by Parker.

Sandro Raniere Guimarães Cordeiro, or just Sandro to you and me, was the player in question. Signed for a significant fee from Tottenham’s Brazilian club partners Internacional he arrived with a growing reputation throughout the world having already made his debut for the full Brazil side.

Sandro’s Tottenham career didn’t get off to the best start, as he played alongside Jake Livermore in central midfield during Tottenham’s 1-4 home defeat by Arsenal in the Carling Cup in September 2010. He went on to make 26 appearances in 2010/11, starring in the Champions League Last 16 ties against AC Milan and scored his first goal for the club against Chelsea from all of 35 yards.

Total Minutes Goals conceded per game Ground 50-50’s Ground 50-50’s win % Tackles Tackle success % Minutes per tackle Interceptions
Parker 2475 0.89 307 55% 107 71.03% 23 95
Sandro 1416 0.94 213 69% 84 73.81% 17 46

The table above highlights the key defensive stats from both players from season 2011/12. While Scott Parker saw a lot more game time than Sandro, the Brazilian was still able to out-do his English team mate in several areas.

The general consensus is that Parker and Sandro are similar players, perhaps too similar to play in the same team without making that team too negative. It’s been said that this could be a smart selection for games away from home, where Spurs won’t enjoy their usual long spells of possession, but our stats here show that, while both being capable defensively, they are in fact very different players.

Parker leads the way in ground 50-50’s, tackles and interceptions, down in no small part to having been on the pitch a lot longer than Sandro. With Parker in the team Spurs also conceded fewer goals, but Sandro shines through in his execution of said skills.

He won a massive 14% more of his ground 50-50’s and also had a greater tackle success percentage and made a tackle 6 minutes more often than Parker, despite being on the pitch a lot less.

The table below looks at Parker and Sandro’s contribution to Tottenham’s attacking game last season.

Passes Pass completion % Successful dribbles Successful dribbles per game Shooting accuracy % Minutes per shot
Parker 1561 89.1% 12 0.41 21% 177
Sandro 703 86.58% 17 0.74 36% 129

While neither player managed to trouble the score sheet last season and in truth they only had 7 shots on target between them all season; both were integral in launching Tottenham’s attacks, if not finishing them off. Passing football is becoming common place in the Premier League in recent times, however not many could compete with Spurs last season in terms of the tempo and fluidity with which they moved the ball from back to front. Although Luka Modric, Gareth Bale and Rafael van der Vaart may have taken the headlines, it was often Parker or Sandro receiving the ball from the back four, before feeding a more creative team mate and letting them work their magic.

Both players have impressive pass completion percentages with Parker coming out on top, managing more than double the passes of Sandro. This is our first real sign that the two are more different than most imagine. While Parker is keen to recycle the ball quickly, often to the side or backwards, Sandro was often seen turning and moving with the ball, before attempting a pass.

This is reinforced by Sandro’s dribbling statistics, as well as his shooting stats, demonstrating that he is more likely to find himself up field getting into areas to attempt a shot. In contrast Parker was often seen holding his position in the middle of pitch, making sure Spurs had a solid buffer should possession be lost and their opponents attempt a counter attack.

Parker’s extra experience goes a long way to deciding his average position on the field, and not because he doesn’t have the energy to go from box-to-box any more. As Parker has improved and matured as a footballer he has discovered that he must pick his moments to support his team’s attacks, as well as knowing when to hold his position in midfield and provide extra security.

Throughout Sandro’s first two seasons with Spurs, then Spurs manager Harry Redknapp was often seen communicating directly with the Brazilian, asking him to hold his position, and not make so many runs forward or follow the ball around the pitch. This was highlighted when Sandro scored his first goal for the club against Chelsea and ran to the dugout to celebrate with the coaching staff, only to be pulled aside by Redknapp and seemingly told not to shirk his defensive responsibilities again.

While Sandro has clearly got an incredible amount of stamina and has the ability to go from box-to-box in that manner, it remains to be seen where new Spurs Head Coach André Villas-Boas will see his future. While Villas-Boas has been prepping his team for the new season, Sandro was playing for Brazil at the Olympic Games in London, and missed the entire pre-season, only reporting back to training two days before Spurs’ season opener at Newcastle United.

With Parker a likely candidate for the captaincy at Spurs, Sandro is likely to find himself competing directly with the England international, or playing a role different from the one he has fulfilled for Spurs and Brazil in the early parts of his career.

Scott+Parker+Tottenham+Hotspur+v+Swansea+City+F4K8M0TywBLl1 300x229 Scott Parker or Sandro? A statistical comparisonTottenham have incredible depth in the centre of midfield, Tom Huddlestone, Jake Livermore, Jermaine Jenas, Tom Carroll, Rafa’ van der Vaart and new signing Gylfi Sigurðsson will all be competing with Parker and Sandro for starting roles this season in Villas-Boas’ expected three-man midfield. There is also yet to be a solution to the Luka Modric transfer saga, although he is still expected to join Real Madrid before the transfer window closes. If Modric does leave, Villas-Boas has already made it clear he would like to bring in a replacement of the same ilk as the Croatian schemer. Such strength in-depth can only motivate each player to make the most of any playing time they receive, which bodes well ahead of the new season for Spurs.

While Parker and Sandro have been labelled similar players, the stats have shown that they both excel in different areas and could easily be used alongside each other with a move creative player ahead of them. An injury to Scott Parker will keep him out until mid-September, meaning Sandro is likely to carry extra defensive responsibilities this season. A starting place could beckon against Newcastle but after just two days training, it would be understandable to see Sandro miss out on a place in the XI.

Having players in the mould of Parker and Sandro means that the creative flair that Spurs base their game around can flourish knowing that there is a metaphorical safety net behind them in the guise of their defensive midfielders. Spurs are praised for the number of attacking and creative options open to them, but those players would be the first to praise the likes of Parker, Sandro and Jake Livermore, who all excelled last season when called upon, for making their jobs so much easier.

While Parker is entering the twilight of his career, the sky is the limit for Sandro. Playing alongside the likes of Scott Parker can only serve as an excellent learning exercise for the young Brazilian and he couldn’t ask for a better mentor in fulfilling that defensive midfield role than Parker. If his know-how and years of experience can rub off on Sandro, Spurs fans will be looking at one hell of a player once he has reached full maturity as a player.

It’s difficult to make a definitive choice between the two after discovering just how different they are. While Parker would almost certainly be the most defensive of the two, and is likely to play in that role this season for Spurs and England; Sandro is capable of being effective further up the pitch, as well as contributing defensively.  Neither are ever likely to be prolific in front of goal, and when playing in Villas-Boas’ preferred formation with only one striker this could be what ultimately makes it a choice between the two midfielders. Spurs will be looking for goals to come from all areas of the pitch this season to help ease the burden on their lone front man. Gareth Bale has shown in the past few seasons he is more than capable of reaching double figures with his finishing while Aaron Lennon has improved his final product too. Sigurðsson and Van der Vaart are both seen as goal scoring midfielders while Tom Huddlestone has always been a threat with his powerful long range shooting ability.

If Villas-Boas does see it as a case of one or the other, I would hope Sandro would be given the nod ahead of Parker in general. I’ve watched many midfielders at White Hart Lane and few have excited me the way Sandro has; in my eyes he truly has the potential to be world-class. André Villas-Boas may be keen to take a leaf from Sir Alex Ferguson’s book and carefully select which games he uses the aging Parker in, much in the way Manchester United use Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes. Parker’s experience is truly invaluable and playing alongside or instead of Sandro in big games could prove to make all the difference for Tottenham Hotspur this season.





Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel via Twitter.
What do you think about this post?
  • Excellent
  • Informative
  • Awesome
  • Good Read
  • ok


About the Author

CharlieTHFC_
CharlieTHFC_





 
 

 
Sturride and Coutinho

The impact of Sturridge & Coutinho | Stats since joining Liverpool

In the last few weeks, Liverpool fans have been treated to several fine attacking displays from Philippe Coutinho and Daniel Sturridge, but how well have they really done?
by Chris Vermeulen
3

 
 
Per Mertesacker

The Premier League’s BFG: Per Mertesacker | Arsenal Defender Stats Comparsion

From Steve Bould, Nigel Winterburn and Tony Adams to Kolu Toure, Sol Campbell and William Gallas, Arsenal have never had the shortage of quality defenders in their team. When Arsenal went an entire season unbeaten in 2003-04...
by Samved Bharadwaj
1

 
 
England Strikers

Who should partner Rooney for England? Carroll, Sturridge, Defoe & Welbeck compared

England’s squad for their summer friendlies with the Republic of Ireland and Brazil were revealed yesterday and the one position that is up for debate more than any is the 2nd striker role. Although there is the possibility o...
by MattEvans
2

 




7 Comments


  1. dave

    Parker is the superior player


    • CharlieTHFC_

      I would say you were right in terms of the job most people expect them to do. As DMs, Parker is the better player. But as an all round CM I would say Sandro is at the very least on par with Parker, and will probably go on to be a vastly superior player.


  2. mattspurs

    you say parker ahead in tackles he has 23 more tackles in about 1000 mins sandro per game is ahead on tackles, the ground 50-50s sandro is ahead per game aswell you need to compare per game as the only stat parker is actually ahead on is the interceptions on the defensive side of things, parker makes more passes than sandro and more interceptions both these points show parkers experience and probably better positioning both players should feature alot this season but for me sandro can and will prove to be one of the best around in the holding role sandro can also learn alot from parkers prem experience and in tough games both could play together but i expect sandro to feature more than parker this season


    • CharlieTHFC_

      I would be happy for AVB to pick and choose Parker’s games, much in the way Sir Alex does with his players and Sandro to play the majority of games. I definitely think Sandro will go on to become world class, but not I don’t think he will be limited to playing the holding role, I think he has the potential to be a more expansive CM.


  3. steve thomas

    Sandro is tremendous, I love his appetite and attitude to the game. Injuries have heald him back slightly for us but let’s hope he can stay fit this season. He is going to be a major star for Spurs & Brazil. Our problem will be when the big boys come calling if we don’t get back into the CL soon. Let’s hope he does go the way of Modric and have his head turned with loadsamoney.


    • CharlieTHFC_

      He seems to genuinely love the club. He seems like the heartbeat of the squad too. Everyone seems to love him as a player and as a bloke. He could go on to become a legend at Spurs, I would love him to do that. But his agent has already been batting his eye lashes at the Italian clubs, but hopefully he won’t be tempted.


  4. steve thomas

    oops that should have said Doesn’t have his head turned – what a twit.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


− four = 2

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>