“The game has changed!” How many times have you heard, particularly from the ex-pros, this statement? There’s no doubt that some ways and forms of modern-day élite football has changed. You only have to look into the life of a professional footballer today, in comparison with a player from 25 years or so ago (their athleticism, their diet, their sports science support, their recovery techniques etc) and that itself should imply a significant difference in the performance of today’s players.
However, it isn’t just the ‘individual’ nature of the game that has changed. Look at the strategical side of things. With the influx of foreign players and managers, what was a very rigid structured, English natured, 4-4-2-loving nation, has now changed into something a lot more flexible and creative.
The days of the ‘winger’ and the ‘No.9’ in particular are not gone, but have in a lot of cases been altered. The very commonly adopted 4-3-3 formation is a prime example, with natural width expected to come mainly from the wide forward players and full backs, and the middle of the front 3 touted as more of a linking player than a direct target.
Because of the innovative tactics and strategies being used by some of today’s managers and coaches, are some of the more traditional footballing strategies going out of the window – like crossing?
Now, it’s not being stated here that no teams cross anymore. The question is; is it a priority for teams and something they still repetitively work on as a main attacking principle on the training field? Or is crossing now an outdated strategy?
This season, teams like Stoke and Norwich have relied on getting the ball in the box to their front men via a more direct ball and by crossing. The players in their armoury, like Holt, Morrison, Crouch and Co. are suited for this type of game but a think round the other clubs doesn’t bring many other old fashioned No.9 types to fruition.
The Premier League has seen the likes of Shearer, Ferdinand, Ferguson, Wright, van Nistlerooy and such, all plying their trade as out and out ‘strikers’, thriving on the direct or crossed ball and scoring an array of headed goals. Nowadays, the lead forward or the ‘no.9’ appears to have taken a different mould. How many of those players are there today, playing as a club’s main striker and flourishing on aerial service like crossing?
Top scorers currently
Top 6 PL goal scorers currently
The first observation from the top 6 goals scorers , is the dominance in right-footed players. Only Robin van Persie has scored more than 3 goals with his left foot, obviously his strongest side. In relation to this article though, is the amount of headers scored. Over the past 10 Premier League season’s, the top scorer has never scored more than 5 headed goals and this season seems to be following a similar trend. Out of 120 goals by these 6 so far this season, only 16 goals have been scored via a header.
Out of the 6 players, how many of them are in the mould of the old fashioned ‘target man’. Demba Ba, used by Newcastle now on the left of a forward 3 and Yakubu at a push?! It seems the best goal-scorers in the league today are the more mobile and creative forwards, the ones occupying the ‘number 10’ role if anything.
Service & scoring
PL teams goal scoring and service
A look at the numbers for some of the more direct methods of scoring this season reveals some very interesting statistics. It is Liverpool who cross the ball the most per game on average in the top flight. Quite an odd one considering they don’t play with a ‘real’ right-sided midfielder and that Stewart Downing isn’t a consistent starter.
Having said that, with Andy Carroll up top who does play that no.9 target role, you can appreciate why Liverpool play that way. The problem for Liverpool and that method, is that they have the worst chance conversion rate across the division at present.
A look at crossing from the teams that are performing at the top of the division this season shows that there isn’t rally a correlation between being there and producing crosses. Both Man Utd and Chelsea produce much more than the average number of crosses per game, but so too do Wolves and Everton.
Playing long balls and scoring from set plays follow a similar suit. Tottenham and Man Utd both advance on the average, where as Man City and Arsenal have the two lowest values.
Next Page: Top Creators in the Premier League (click bottom right or top right for next page)
- Excellent
- Informative
- Awesome
- Good Read
- ok
Categories: Arsenal (NN), Aston Villa, Blackburn Rovers, Bolton Wanderers, Chelsea, EPL, EPL Index Featured Article, EPL Index Statistical Comparisons, EPL Opta Stats, Everton, Fulham, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester Utd, Newcastle Utd, Norwich City, Opta Stats, QPR, Stoke City, Sunderland, Swansea City, Tottenham Hotspur, West Bromwich Albion, Wigan, Wolves
Tags: AFC, assists, AVFC, BRFC, BWFC, CFC, crossing, efc, EPL, epl opta stats, ffc, goals, LFC, MCFC, MUFC, NCFC, NUFC, Opta Stats, QPR, SAFC, scafc, SCFC, THFC, WAFC, wbafc, wwfc
This article has had 5,713 Views
Good article, and one thet relates to my ideas about attacking football. I got tired of treading that brilliant young players like Aaron Lennon had “no end product” – meaning, his airball crosses rarely connected with a Spurs forehead. With four defenders habitually packing the box even Stanley Matthews would have found it hard to connect with Stan Mortensen with the regularity he did.
The dangerous ball nowadays is along the ground.
EVEN THE LANGUAGE IS CHANGING !
“strategical”
This article also doesnt look into how many crosses have been put into the box, how many have been converted. It is only looking at the number of crosses from the assists. Valencia puts in more crosses than most wingers in the EPL, however, hardly any have been converted. This could be a problem of the existing strikers, who hardly convert any of the crosses any more.
I`m no expert but just from watching the games on TV Arsenal don`t seem to get an end result very often from wide crosses or corners come to that. One of the reasons being there`s no one in the middle apart from van Persie and occasionally Vermaelen (corners excepted). A greater threat seems to come from players like Ox-C ,who has dribbling skills, cutting in
and finding a striker who is hanging back a bit.For me the days of the winger running hell for leather down the touch line and crossing from the corner post are limited. Sometimes it works but the longer that ball is in the air the better chance the defence have of repelling the attack. I suppose this begs the question “how do you fit someone like Walcott in” who relys purely on pace?
Good article but i cant help but notice the amount of crosses put in by Liverpool compared to Stoke – yet Caroll has considered to have no service.
If Carol played for Stoke, the service would be less but of a more tactical standard. Crosses would be put in early and into targeted areas, leaving defenders out of position. Liverpool will pass 20 times before crossing, thus having the entire opposition back line back, turned and set to defend.
I would completely agree, crosses are lacking quality, teams think the percentages will work and yet quality is so poor!