Written by: Jake Cohen - December 31, 2012

Everton 1 Chelsea 2 | Tactical Analysis


On Rafa Benitez’s first return to Merseyside as Chelsea manager, a Frank Lampard double secured the three points for Chelsea. After a Steven Pienaar goal allowed Everton to take the lead in a closely fought match, Chelsea showed their big match experience, taking all three points despite not playing as well as their opponents.

Line-Up’s

image10 Everton 1 Chelsea 2 | Tactical Analysis

Everton vs Chelsea Line-Up’s

Everton lined up in a 4-4-2 with Victor Anichebe and Johnny Heitinga getting starts due to injuries and suspension. As always, Leighton Baines overlapped constantly on the left wing, which created 2 vs 1 situations up against Cesar Azpilicueta, the Chelsea right back. Anichebe came into the side up front for his strength and aerially ability up against Branislav Ivanovic and Gary Cahill.

Chelsea played in a 4-3-3 with Frank Lampard, Ramires and David Luiz playing in the midfield trio. Azpilicueta played for Chelsea at right back, due to John Terry’s injury. There was a shift with Juan Mata and Eden Hazard playing in a front 3 with Fernando Torres.

Azpilicueta Targeted by Everton

Cesar Azpilicueta was very obviously targeted early on by Everton. Azpilicueta is not the first-choice right back for Chelsea, and Everton used this to their advantage. Baines, a very good attacking left back, was encouraged to go forward as often as possible. As Azpilicueta was often isolated, it meant Everton were able to create 2 vs 1 situations, which Everton were able to create a number of goalscoring chances from.

image9 Everton 1 Chelsea 2 | Tactical Analysis

Everton 2 vs 1′s

As the game developed, Azpilicueta grew into the game and Benitez changed the defensive structure and tactics to assist him more. He was able to complete 4 interceptions and 2 tackles throughout the match, which indicates he was positioned well defensively, especially in the 2nd half. This also meant that Baines had less attacking influence on the match, as he wasn’t getting the freedom to whip crosses in at such a regular rate.

image11 300x97 Everton 1 Chelsea 2 | Tactical Analysis

Attacking Zones

Baines ranks the highest in the league for chances created and, as expected, a lot of Everton’s attacks came down their left-hand side. Chelsea’s attacks were much more evenly distributed, and used Mata on the right side more than Hazard down the Chelsea left.

Lampard’s Intelligence and Experience

Frank Lampard showed his intelligence and experience throughout this fixture with a range of great attacking runs and passes which created goalscoring chances. This was shown by Lampard’s positioning in the box for his first goal, a strong header to Tim Howard’s left side. The positioning in the box from Lampard was intelligent, as he was able to get in between Jagielka and Heitinga, without being picked up by either defender.

image12 300x225 Everton 1 Chelsea 2 | Tactical Analysis

Lampard’s First Goal

Lampard, playing in a midfield 3, was able to create a few goalscoring chances for his team mates, although they were unable to be dispatched. He played 3 key passes (chance creating passes) for his team mates, which showed that defensively Chelsea had the superior numbers in central midfield, so Lampard was allowed more room than he might have otherwise have had. The key to Lampard’s performance was his ability to run unmarked into the Everton box. This is something that Lampard has been known for in the past and was highlighted in this fixture.

Whilst Lampard was able to create a number of goalscoring chances, his passing statistics were below his usually high standards. Lampard completed 30 of his 49 passes (61%) and he misplaced passes which he would normally make. However, none of these misplaced passes amounted to Everton scoring. Lampard will hope to improve his passing for future matches, as the better sides may capitalise on the misplaced passes.

Everton’s Bad Luck and Wastefulness

Everton had 6 out of their 14 shots on target, with a further 3 hitting the post or crossbar. If Everton were luckier with their attempts which hit the posts, they would have won. As Everton dominated much of the first 30 minutes, David Moyes would be kicking himself for his team’s inability to put away their early chances. If they had done this, they would have walked away with at least 1 point, but more likely 3.

Everton were unlucky as they hit the post 3 times. With Jelavic hitting the crossbar in the 70th minute, this may have meant Everton won the match, due to momentum being with them. It was a delightfully whipped in cross from Baines, which Jelavic flicked onto the crossbar and out of the substitute goalkeeper, Ross Turnbull’s, reach. However, only 2 minutes later, a goalmouth scramble at the opposite end was turned in by Frank Lampard, for Chelsea’s 2nd goal and allowed Chelsea to take home the 3 points.

Conclusion

The final result of this fixture was quite deceiving, with Everton being set up better tactically and having the better chances. However, it was a good win by Chelsea and moves them into touching distance of Manchester City, 4 points behind with a match in hand.

Frank Lampard put in a man-of-the-match performance, with 2 goals and the creation of a number of goalscoring chances for his teammates. Whether this performance is enough to get him a new contract remains to be seen, but it highlighted what he can offer Chelsea now and in the future. With Chelsea’s attacking trio of Mata, Oscar, and Hazard, Lampard has had to play deeper in midfield, and has done a good job overall.





Thanks for rating this! Now tell the world how you feel via Twitter.
What do you think about this post?
  • Excellent
  • Informative
  • Awesome
  • Good Read
  • ok


About the Author

Jake Cohen
Jake Cohen





 
 

 
Picture24

Premier League Managerial Changes: Do They Guarantee Success? Stats

The twenty Premier League teams for next season are very close to being finalised, with the final place being decided this weekend in a £120m game between Crystal Palace & Watford.  Both clubs have had new managers in the...
by Andy Smith
0

 
 
Error Prone Teams Premier League 2012-13

Info-Graphic | Most Error Prone Teams in the Premier League 2012-13

There are some surprises in the info-graphic below. You’d expect the relegation threatened teams to be the most error prone in the Premier League and whilst this is true in the case of Newcastle United (just about stayed ...
by Statto
0

 
 
Spurs AVB

Have Tottenham Improved Under AVB? Opta Stats Analysis

Andre Villas-Boas has impressed this season, his debut as Tottenham manager, finishing on a record 72 points and taking Spurs to a Europa League quarter final. Spurs just missed out on Champions League qualification, finishing ...
by James Amey
2

 




6 Comments


  1. Dylan

    chelsea switched to a 4-2-3-1 with mata the central playmaker and ramires wide right after about 8 minutes. just saying


  2. Dylan

    also ramires tracked baines forays foward well when deployed on the right where all the action came from this flank. in truth ramires won the battle, was the games key player from a tactical point of view as he played a big role in chelsea’s equaliser and subsequent comeback. due to benitez in game switch he probably won the tactical battle for that reason too. no mention of moyes late switch to 4-3-3 or of his sides intense pressing first half which dropped in the second half due to fatigue, an everton’s initial shape was more 4-4-1-1 to make up the nemerical disadvantage in midfield.


    • Jake Cohen

      Disagree with a few things you say.

      You’re correct in talking about the Ramires switch to a more attacking right sided position. However, Baines and Pienaar dominated that left hand side for much of the first half. As Everton are known for playing down the left hand side, it was very evident, as you also say. Baines and Pienaar played 19 crosses throughout the match and caused Chelsea problems a number of times.

      Yes Ramires did play the cross for the first goal and tracked Baines more so in the second half, but I disagree that he was the games key player. Baines was able to cover him well, for the most part, defensively. Look at the action on 47 mins and you’ll see that Baines continued upfield without any Chelsea defenders watching him. It was Ramires who was meant to be tracking him there. It was for this reason that Cahill fouled him and he ended with the cut/graze on his back.

      I disagree that Chelsea won the tactical battle. Even the most hardened Chelsea supporters have said they were getting dominated early and came back into the match after about 30-35 minutes. Both sides still lacked quality in their passing in this match with both sides completing 73% and 72% respectively throughout. I felt the 2nd half was quite even actually.

      Everton changed between Pienaar and Anichebe defending on the left, but for the majority it was Pienaar there. Anichebe was there so Everton could target Azpilicueta in the air, as shown by the first goal. However, most of the problems came from the 2 vs 1 situations that Pienaar and Baines created against him.


    • Jake Cohen

      Thanks for reading the piece and your thoughts. It always adds to discussion so it’s appreciated.


      • Dylan

        Thanks for the reply and sorry if I put forward those arguments in an abrupt manner. Maybe I was still hurting a bit from not winning the game and as I was in the ground and haven’t watched it back or seen stats I have obviously missed certain things like the incident you refer to on 47 minutes for example. And besides you can articulate your thoughts a lot better than I can but I’m glad that good football debate can arise from the desire to learn more from the game.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


four − = 3

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>