Liverpool defeated the newly promoted Southampton 1-nil, although their display was more convincing then the score-line suggested. The game wasn’t particularly difficult to understand, with Liverpool’s dominate display aided by the fact Southampton sat back and was sloppy. A headed goal by Daniel Agger just prior to half-time gave Liverpool the lead, although more should have followed.
Line Ups
The biggest inclusion to the Liverpool line-up was the return of Lucas Leiva. Lucas returned from a three month spell on the sidelines with a tear in his quad, that coming after missing the entire second half of last season with a knee injury. His return meant Liverpool’s midfield formation changed from two pivots (in a 4-{2-1}-3) to just the one (a 4-{1-2}-3). Also, Jonjo Shelvey played a role in the front three.
Southampton named an unchanged team from their 1-1 draw with Norwich mid-week. Lining up in a 4-4-1-1, Southampton sat deeper, allowing Liverpool to play out from defence comfortably and tried to remain compact defensively.
Liverpool’s Attacking Dominance
In an attacking sense, there were two keys to the first half – Southampton’s willingness to sit back and Liverpool’s willingness to get players into advanced positions. Liverpool has struggled in transition this season, getting caught with too many players (the fullbacks in particular) forward when possession is lost, however the return of Lucas certainly aided Liverpool when going forward, with the players knowing they would have adequate cover.
Almost immediately, this license to get forward was evident – with two chances coming within minutes of each other.
The first chance, from a Steven Gerrard long ball to Suarez, led to a shot from Shelvey. It was clear the fullbacks were able to move forward to support, with Lucas shielding the two central defenders.
Not too long later, Liverpool had another good chance, again with players breaking forward. Johnson received the ball in space and passed to Suarez who ran in behind the young left fullback Shaw. Johnson then broke into the box, along with Gerrard, Shelvey and Allen. Suarez’s cross found Johnson at the front post but Liverpool, with five players in the box and Sterling lurking just outside, could not convert.
As previously stated, this freedom to get forward was aided with the return of Lucas, who, despite appearing slightly rusty in his first game back, was solid defensively and also in possession. His tackling and passing statistics highlight Lucas’s importance to Liverpool, he is necessary to break up play but also to keep the ball moving, both of which he did successfully here.
Also, Liverpool played with noticeable fluidity in the final third. The front trio of Jonjo Shelvey, Luis Suarez and Raheem Sterling showcased intelligent movement, drifting inside and out to confuse the Southampton defence. Shelvey and Sterling were particularly fluid, rotating positions, dropping deeper and on occasions both would find themselves on the same side of the pitch to create an attacking overload.
This fluidity, and in particular Shelvey’s and Sterling’s willingness to drift inside, allowed the Liverpool fullbacks to push forward into the space out wide.
This was a perfect example of such movement, occurring in the first half. With Southampton sitting deep and trying to narrow the pitch, Steven Gerrard was allowed time on the ball on halfway. Sterling drifted inside which brought Shaw slightly inside too. Gerrard was then able to slide a pass in between Lallana and Cork and towards the overlapping Glen Johnson. From there, Shelvey, Sterling, Suarez and Allen all broke into the box; however a clearance at the front post from the retreating Fonte prevented a goal for Liverpool.
Despite creating numerous chances, and having Jonjo Shelvey hit the post, Liverpool took the lead with Daniel Agger’s goal coming moments before half-time. Luis Suarez’s free-kick struck the crossbar and the ball fell to Johnson, who crossed for Agger to head home. However, just before the break Southampton’s best chance of the first period came when Ricky Lambert’s long-range effort had Pepe Reina scrambling to touch it around his post.
Second Half
Despite Southampton having a bright opening to the second half, Liverpool’s dominance continued. Liverpool created 21 chances, attempted 22 shots and had 63.9% of possession. Southampton sat deep and tried to counter, that much was admitted by Nigel Adkins post-match:
Despite the score remaining 1-0, more due to Liverpool’s characteristic inability to covert, Southampton’s play was sloppy and lacked spark. Liverpool was untroubled and continued to dominate right until the end, with Jose Enrique, Luis Suarez and Raheem Sterling all having multiple chances to put the game beyond doubt.
However, the score-line remained the same and Liverpool picked up all three points. Liverpool now move to 11th whilst Southampton remain in the relegation zone, 1 point off Sunderland in 17th.
All of the stats from this article have been taken from the Opta Stats Centre at EPLIndex.com – Subscribe Now (Includes author privileges!) Check out our new Top Stats feature on the Stats Centre which allows you to compare all players in the league & read about new additions to the stats centre.
- Excellent
- Informative
- Awesome
- Good Read
- ok
Categories: EPL Index Featured Article, EPLIndex Tactical Report, Liverpool
Tags: 4-3-3, 4-4-1-1, english Premier league, EPL, epl opta stats, EPL Stats, LFC, LFC Stats, Liverpool, Lucas Leiva, Lucas Leiva stats, Luis Suarez, premier league, Premier League Stats, Southampton
This article has had 2,393 Views









Also, Liverpool played with noticeable fluidity in the final third.
OPTA data is great as it shows final third passing and FTPC (completed)
Liverpool have one of the worst goal to final third passing completed ratio’s in the PREM. Before yesterday it was 1/93.1 and yesterday. 128 completed final third passes and just 1 goal.
The reason why there is no correlation with Liverpool and FTPC and goals is that they are very poor at recycling possession and in the final third they are very poor.
Gerrard is a big factor. Approx 16% of the FTPC. He should retire.
Personally, I don’t understand what this data has to do with my tactical analysis of the Liverpool, Southampton game.
Yes they had more final third passes then normal, and yes their finishing this season has been poor but using raw numbers to quantify their performances is useless. The numbers need to be in the context to the match, the players, the movement, the tactics etc.
In the final third Liverpool aren’t poor, yet they don’t score as many as they should. Numbers tell us that but they don’t say why. Is it mental, technical or is it the type/location of the chances?
For example, Liverpool’s final third play is often intricate, and in tight spaces they have been guilty of overplaying situations. This Isn’t a statistical problem, but a tactical problem. Also, you brought up Gerrard and stated he should retire due to his poor final third pass completion rate, this is ridiculous. Yes, most would admit Steven Gerrard hasn’t been as good this season as in previous. But what are the reasons for this?
Also, in a previous statistical analysis you mentioned Gerrard has only had 6 shots on target, yet another example of why he is past it – again you failed to explain why this is. The reason for this is his role within the system, and namely the loss of Lucas Leiva. As I mentioned above, with Lucas playing Liverpool are able to play with one pivot, therefore Gerrard is able to play in a more advanced role. This coincided with his best attacking display, creating 6 goal chances and having 3 shots.
Previously, with Lucas out, Liverpool played with two pivots to counteract his absence. This restricted, rightly or wrongly, Gerrard’s role.
Again, raw numbers in football are incredibly difficult to create successful and factual correlations to football events, because football isn’t closed. Therefore, stating that they have ‘X’ number of completed final third passes and ‘Y’ number of goals and saying this proves their poor fluidity is completely useless. To successfully analyse football you must state why, who, when, how and what. You are only stating what amd who, the raw numbers and the players involved. You fail to mention the football context – ie the where, why and how
Very good response Kate. In fact Gerrard is now the second most creative person in the league with 42 chances and this is from a deeper position – imagine how many chances he will create once he’s playing in a more attacking role. Good article as always too.
I do enjoy reading your articles Kate but liverpool and fluidity are not a word that should be used.
Thanks for the comments
But questioning Liverpool’s fluidity on the basic of the final third passing to goals correlation is foolish. Unless you are talking about things like ProZone, stats don’t show player movement. Liverpool’s movement, with Suarez dropping deep and wide, Sterling and Shelvey rotating, Allen and Gerrard frequently bursting into the box and Enrique and Johnson in advanced attacking positions … That is the epitome of fluidity.
Thanks again
second most creative? That is interesting.
Again, raw numbers in football are incredibly difficult to create successful and factual correlations to football events, because football isn’t closed.
Shows how very little is known about raw football data.
Interpretation of football data is at a very early stage in development.
I stand down from the ”argument” and will continue to look at raw football data
Nice to read that, I have always read your articles. I am not sure how much correct I am but as far as I understand current LFC playing system., the kind of chances created do not match with the philosophy. I mean to say that when we have so much possession, we should be able to create at least few simple tap in chances from 6-9 yard throughout the match. The chances which I have seen are mostly from tight angles OR players simply take headless shot when there are legs and legs to block these shots and hope that one of them will go in. Because death by football or whatever should finally come to scoring goals and I don’t see that happening right now. It will be interesting to know what you think about this
I think Liverpool’s attacking system is still in its early stages. The main patterns used to create chances revolve around the movement and ability of Suarez. Suarez pulls into areas which confuse defenders – do they stick with him or let him go? If they let him go, Suarez often receives passes directly from the back (Agger in particular) or from midfield and he is able to turn and dribble or combine. If Suarez is tracked, other players exploit the space left by the defender.
Without Lucas, Liverpool’s play often required Suarez’s movement to be the catalyst, however with Lucas playing against Southampton, Liverpool added more variety to their play. Gerrard and Allen frequently played or ran in/around the box and the fullbacks added power and penetration out wide. It will be interesting the see if this continues in future games.
I think the attacking system defiantly matches Rodgers’ perceived philosophy of ‘tiki-taka’ and I think in future such chances will begin to be converted, as Liverpool are now able to have more players forward with Lucas playing.
Thanks for continuing to read my work